Membership, PRISM and eligibility¶
| Concept | What it gets you | Who needs it | Where it happens |
|---|---|---|---|
| MLCommons CLA | The right to contribute code and submit results | The individual making the submission | MLCommons CLA process |
| PRISM account + API token | Authentication for every CLI command | The individual making the submission | MLCommons Member Central → API Keys |
| MLCommons membership | Organisational standing. Committee seats come from finalized results, not membership (§2.1) | Your organisation | MLCommons |
What membership does affect¶
Getting on the review committee. The committee is drawn from organisations with a recent finalized MLPerf Endpoints result (Submission Rules §2.1). You earn a committee seat by submitting, not by joining.
Challenging other submissions. Only committee members can raise a late objection or nominate a submission for audit; any MLCommons member can report suspected fraud (Scope and Standing for Late Concerns).
Failing to review costs you the seat. Miss an assigned review and your organisation is off the committee until it has a newly finalized result (§2.6).
Licensing¶
Submitted code is made under the MLCommons CLA and is Apache-2-compatible (§5.4). Plan
for your src/ directory (endpoint interface code, infrastructure setup, client harness) to be
published after finalization. For the Standardized division this is not optional; reproducibility by
a third party is a requirement.
The full pre-flight list is on Before you begin.
Next: Before you begin
The policy repository wins
This page summarises policy in submitter language. It does not restate it. Where this
page and mlcommons/endpoints_policies
disagree, the policy repository is correct and this page is a bug. Please
report it.
Last verified against: mlcommons/endpoints_policies@v1.0_rules_dev (6b0b1ef), 2026-09-24.